The provided data indicates significant divergence between sharp and soft bookmaker odds across several markets, particularly favoring Orlando City SC. The 'Match Winner | Away' market shows a substantial EV of +16% when comparing Betfair (sharp) at 3.75 to Unibet (soft) at 4.35. This suggests a potential mispricing where the soft bookmaker has not fully adjusted to the market's collective information, or that the market is still in a state of price discovery. Other markets like 'Double Chance | Draw/Away' also present positive EV, reinforcing the potential undervaluation of Orlando City SC's chances.

1. Identify Market Inefficiency: The core of the Lineup Info Edge strategy is to exploit information asymmetry. The significant EV values (up to +16%) derived from the sharp vs. soft bookmaker comparison indicate a potential inefficiency in the soft market's pricing for Orlando City SC outcomes. 2. Focus on Primary Markets: The highest EV is found in the 'Match Winner | Away' market, which is a primary market suitable for this strategy. The 'Double Chance | Draw/Away' also shows strong EV and provides a safer, correlated exposure. 3. Absence of RLM: The lack of Reverse Line Movement (RLM) suggests that while there is a price discrepancy, it hasn't yet triggered a strong correction from the soft bookmakers, preserving the potential edge. 4. Lineup Info Edge Context: While specific lineup changes are not yet provided, the current odds discrepancy creates an 'alert' state. If a key NYCFC player is unexpectedly benched or injured, and the soft bookmaker (Unibet/Bet365) fails to adjust their Orlando City SC odds downwards (or NYCFC odds upwards) to reflect this new information, the existing EV would be amplified, creating a strong 'back' signal. Conversely, if a key Orlando player is out, the signal would be 'avoid' or 'lay'.